Village Voices

Details: Published: 14 November 2011; Created: 14 November 2011; Last Updated: 17 November 2011; Hits: 4698

housing The big news from the Village Board meeting on Wednesday November 9 was the passage of new code requiring the inclusion of fair and affordable housing units in multiple housing developments in Scarsdale. The new code requires the inclusion of an affordable unit in developments of 5-9 units and 10-14 units and the inclusion of 2 affordable units in developments of 15-24 units. The units shall be compatible in appearance with the market-rate units and marketed in accordance with HUD Guidelines.

Though the inclusion of this code was the subject of discussion at many meetings, in reality it will likely only result in the creation of a handful of affordable units in Scarsdale. With the scarcity of available land here for multiple family developments, this new code is more a gesture of Scarsdale’s cooperation with the county than a mandate to build affordable housing in Scarsdale.

At the November 9 meeting, Trustee Brodsky answered a list of questions posed by Martin Kaufman at a prior meeting. In her responses she said that the new code “enhances the Village’s ability to provide fair and affordable housing” and “does not concede that housing in Scarsdale has been unfair.” The model code suggested by the Federal monitor has been “tailored by the Village Board and the Planning Board to account for Scarsdale’s unique characteristics,” and “the Village is seeking to be proactive and cooperative with Westchester County’s efforts.”

However, these answers were not enough for Kaufman who spoke further at the meeting to clarify his prior question and pose new ones.

He questioned whether the code specifies that housing would be made available to police, fire or home care personnel and whether the Village had an obligation to adopt the model code. These and other questions prompted Village Attorney Wayne D. Esannason to tell Kaufman that “this is not cross examination, “ and to instruct Kaufman to “address (his) comments to the Board, and if you have other questions send them to the Board.”

Kaufman wanted to know if there was a definition of “ethnically diverse households” and Esannason replied, “I think you can give plain meaning to this language.” Kaufman pointed out that this language was grammatically incorrect.

Kaufman also cautioned that the League of Women Voters had expressed approval for the new code, believing that the provision would make housing available for school teachers and seniors. He said, “the community may be confused as it does not provide for senior or workforce housing.” Furthermore he wanted to know if the " Board considered the impact of the amendment on the propensity of developers to build workforce or senior housing which is not stipulated in this law." He added, "If a developer provides affordable housing they will be less likely to provide workforce housing.”

Bobby Ben Simon of 11 Seneca Road also spoke, asking, “What will be the effect on residents of providing affordable housing?” He said he was surprised it was so empty at Village Hall and that “we need to open the pros and cons for the public to decide.”

Doug Ulene of 7 Cayuga Road spoke in support of the new amendments, saying, “regardless if it is an obligation of this municipality or the federal government, I support it and believe we should lead on this issue.”

Despite resident reservations, the resolution was put to a vote and received unanimous support among the Trustees and Mayor at the meeting, though Trustee Toder was absent. With this vote the new code is enacted and could mean that the development at the former Heathcote Tavern will include an affordable unit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scarsdale10583 received the following letter from League of Women Voter's President Marylou Green in response to the above article:

At the meeting of the Village Board on November 9, the Trustees heard comments from the public regarding the Fair and Affordable Housing Code amendment. Mr. Martin Kaufman is quoted in “Scarsdale Adopts Fair and Affordable Housing Code,” posted on your site, as saying “the League of Women Voters had expressed approval for the new code, believing that the provision would make housing available for school teachers and seniors.” This is a misinterpretation of our statement presented to the Trustees on October 25. Our position as stated is as follow:

“The League of Women Voters has a longstanding position in support of measures to increase the supply of housing in Scarsdale for a wider income range than now exists and therefore supports an affordable housing zoning code amendment. There remain certain provisions of this amendment that necessitate further comment from the LWVS.

We understand the proposed amendment of the Zoning Code relating to the provision of Fair and Affordable housing has been carefully reviewed and further clarified by the Planning Board and thereafter by the Board of Trustees with special notes for further clarification of the marketing and monitoring components. We also understand that this amendment will not limit FAH to Scarsdale residents and workforce but will be marketed broadly throughout the area. Our positions have historically included provisions for Scarsdale seniors, municipal and school employees and others on whose presence every community depends. We ask the Village to also continue to encourage affordable housing opportunities for Scarsdale residents and employees.”

The League appreciates this opportunity to clarify our position.

Marylou Green
President, LWVS

Details: Published: 10 November 2011; Created: 10 November 2011; Last Updated: 10 November 2011; Hits: 4550

The following Open Letter was read by Geoff Loftus, Edgemont Community Council president, at the Public Comment portion of the Nov. 9 Greenburgh Town Board Meeting: The Edgemont Community Council (ECC) met on November 7, 2011 and voted to ask the Town Board to please reconsider the 2012 Budget – as proposed we believe this budget has some fundamental issues:

The 2012 Budget requires a $1.8 million draw down from the fund balance to keep the increase in taxes down.

We would like to know the specifics and probability of the $250,000 sale of town property, as a similar item for $550,000 in the 2011 budget has not materialized. The 2012 Budget also assumes increases in revenues from rental fees but offers no explanation why these fees should more than double and triple.

The proposed Budget appears to inflate revenues by including hundreds of thousands of dollars in grant revenue for such items as conservation programs, a study of Hartsdale Avenue and community development, but with no corresponding expenditures required for these grants. Even if the town's contribution is zero, it must still spend the funds and that spending should be listed in the Budget.

The 2012 Budget calls for cuts in insurance. We remember when the town had to pay out a substantial sum when a tree killed a motorist on Central Avenue and the Town was under-insured. Also, the proposed Budget has substantial cuts in contingency lines which means the town may have to dip further into fund balance should anything unforeseen arise.

We believe the proposed Budget makes use of some questionable accounting approaches and assumptions instead of cutting costs and creating a reasonable fiscal path for Greenburgh's future. Instead, in this proposal, we still have:

Redundant recreation departments with duplicative commissioners, staffs, facilities and costs.
A Town-run after-school program when every school district already has its own program.
A Town SWAT team when the county has one – no one else seems to feel the need of their own SWAT team.

The budget calls for a few job cuts, but the budget message says the jobs will be restored if the unions agree to Town demands. Problem is, the budget seems to assume the unions will agree because there's no provision for any increase in wages.

The ECC calls upon the members of the Town Board to reject this Budget and go back to work – to produce a budget that will move Greenburgh into a healthy fiscal future.

Sincerely,

Geoff Loftus
President, The Edgemont Community Council

Details: Published: 01 November 2011; Created: 01 November 2011; Last Updated: 02 November 2011; Hits: 4936

stormetonroad Police and firefighters had an extraordinary weekend, responding to continuous calls for help due to broken branches and downed power lines. The incidents are too numerous to list, but at the bottom of this page is a partial record of where emergency responders were called on Saturday and Sunday to remove branches and tape off streets. The damage was extensive.

Storm claims: A branch from a Village owned tree fell on a 2011 Toyota parked in a Madison Road driveway on the afternoon of October 29th. The branch damaged the car. Also on 10/30, at around 4 pm a limb from a Village owned tree fell on a 2006 Honda as it was travelling on Secor Road. The car belongs to a Manhattan man.

Here’s news from the police log from earlier in the week:

DWI: Mosa Naber, age 47 of Ossining was arrested for DWI on Sunday at 11:30 am when his 2001 Jeep Cherokee stalled on the Post Road at Crane Road. As he spoke with police they noticed he appeared drunk. Naber failed sobriety tests and was found to have a BAC of .16. His car was towed, he was given a court appearance date and released to his wife.

Death: Francine Nolinstein of New Rochelle found her 96 year-old neighbor dead in a Dickel Road home on the afternoon of October 25th. No further details were provided by the police.

Missing student: Police were called on the morning of 10/24 when a foreign exchange student failed to get off the train at Scarsdale. The 17 year-old girl was supposed to meet someone at the station at 10:46 am but never appeared. Police contacted the MTA, and the Greenburgh and White Plains police departments. At 1:35 am the girl called and said she had returned to her hotel in Manhattan.

Missing zebra: A ceramic zebra that sits on a traffic triangle at the intersection of Colvin Road and Greenacres Avenue was stolen for the second time. The striped zebra disappeared on October 24th. If you see it, please email [email protected] so that we can arrange for it to be returned.

Found: A red and silver Rhino bike was found on the north side of the Metro North train platform at Scarsdale Station on the morning of October 25th.

Police were called to Lange’s Deli on the afternoon of 10/24 to help get a man with psychological problems to go to White Plains hospital. SVAC arrived and transported the man to the hospital.

Trapped: A Post Road woman got locked in her bedroom when the doorknob fell off. At 9 am on 10/29. Her son was outside the house and could not get in because the front door had a dead bolt. The Fire Department got into the house through a bedroom window and let the woman out.

A caller was trapped under the garage at 2 Overhill Road on the afternoon of 10/24. An employee was able to assist.

Dispute: On October 25, a Dell Road homeowner reported that her tenant had removed a “For Sale” sign from the front lawn of the property. The homeowner is in the process of evicting the tenant for unpaid rent. The tenant denied removing the sign.

On 10/26 a Sheldrake Road man complained that his neighbor’s dogs are defecating on his lawn and no one is picking up after them.

A Church Lane man surrendered a firearm he found in his attic on the afternoon of October 24th.

An Old Orchard Lane woman reported that a bleeding coyote was in her backyard at 5:46 pm on October 25th. The coyote was gone by the time police arrived.

Harassed: On 10/24 a Broadmoor Road woman reported that she has been harassed by her housekeeper’s husband since February. He sends her annoying text messages. Though she asked him to stop, he continues to text her.

A Dolma Road man reported the receipt of two threatening text messages on October 26th. The man felt threatened and alarmed by the messages as he is involved in several legal situations.

Scratched: A car belonging to a Garth Road woman was damaged when it was parked across the street from the high school on the morning of October 24. The Jeep Wrangler had a long scratch on the rear passenger door when the woman returned to her car.

The top of the trunk of a Honda was keyed when it was parked in the Freightway Garage on October 22nd.

On 10/26, an 81 year-old Meadow Road man sold three watches of sentimental value to his family to a Greenburgh man. When the seller’s son found out, he came to police to ask them to intervene and see if they could have the watches returned. The buyer agreed to return the watches.

Accidents: Alice Weinrib, age 92 of Whig Road accidentally hit the accelerator when her 1998 Volvo was parked on East Parkway on the afternoon of October 28th. The car hit a parking meter and then ran into an unoccupied car parked on Christie Place. No injuries were reported.

A representative from Scarsdale and Edgemont Family Counseling reported a 7 year-old child walking alone on East Parkway on the morning of 10/28. When police arrived they found that the child was actually 12 years old and was walking to the village for breakfast with his father’s permission.

Here is a list of where police were called this weekend to assist with storm related problems:

Palmer/Sycamore, Chesterfield/Brite, Butler/Chesterfield, 5 Fairview, School Lane, Sherbrooke Road, 19 Heathcote Road, Penn Boulevard, 26 Overhill, 24 Ogden, Post/Mamoroneck, Saxon Woods/Black Birch, Myrtledale/Bansom, 2 Harwood Court, Broadmoor/Griffin, 107 Brewster, Boulevard between Bradley and Madison,14 Clarence, 36 Kent,Kensington/Cahawney, 14 Autenreith, River Road, Mamoroneck/Saxon Woods, 75 Huntington, 55 Morris Lane, 8 Palmer, 37 Lawrence, Cambridge/Oxford, Hamilton/Drake

9 Walworth, 9 Ridgecrest, Vanderbilt, Broadmoor, Post/Ferncliff, Bell/ Carmen, Ogden/Paddington, 21 Hutchison, Walworth/Brook Lane, 1 Berkeley, Fox Meadow/Olmstead, 69 Griffen, Mamaroneck/ Harvest, 305 Heathcote, Church at Popham, 193 Saxon Woods, 41 Ogden, Church at Wayside, 19 Rectory, Post south of Fenimore, 1159 Post Road, Lee Road at Potter, Fairview between Greendale and Post, 73 Huntington, Heathcote Bypass, 4 Ridgecrest, East Palmer at Secor, Eton/ Windmill, Johnson at Boulevard, Drake at Madison

35 Herkimer, Secor at Balducci Store, 5 Coralyn Norma/Coralyn, Ogden at Fox Meadow, Black Birch Road, 30 Whig Road, 2,4,6 Jefferson, Mamaroneck at Myrtledale, 21 Hutchinson, Madison at Tunstall, Nelson/Edgewood,2 Ferncliff, Crane, Ferncliff, Boulevard/Nelson, Kingston/Montrose, Hampton/Butler, Lee Road, 4 Wayside, Brewster at the High School, 7 Westview Road, Hampton/Olmstead, 7 Forest Road, 9 Haverford, Brite/Fenimore/Sage, 197 Madison, 152 Bradley, Kingston/Greenacres, 28 Bradford, Nelson/Tunstall, 227 Madison, Circle Road,Johnson/Boulevard, 4 Seneca Road, 155 Clarence, Spraque/White, 31 Walworth, 73 Griffen, 10 Canterbury, 4 Coralyn, 2 Rodney, Cohawney/Kensington, 8 Autenrieth, 14 Hamilton, 61 Brown, 1 Copper Beach, 25 Carmen

31 Valley Circle/Overhill 14 Ross Rd 950 Post Rd Gorham/Farley Brite/Chesterfield Hampton/Butler 4 Walworth 27 Valley Claremont/Walworth Rodney/Jefferson 103 Brown 18 Paddington 7 Westview 7 Forest 262 Nelson 260 Nelson Olmstead/Brewster Graham/Tyler 182 Lyons 73 Brewster Rodney/Jefferson/Hamilton 14 Claremont 2 Penn Ogden/Paddington 22 Fairview Bethal Road

Details: Written by Joanne Wallenstein; Published: 07 November 2011; Created: 07 November 2011; Last Updated: 14 November 2011; Hits: 4079

cnclogoa The Scarsdale Village election for the Citizen’s Nominating Committee is just one week away. Voting will take place at Scarsdale Village Hall on Tuesday November 15th, 2011, from 7 - 9:30 A.M. and 2 - 9 P.M. However, if you won’t be able to get to the polls, you can download the ballot online and mail it in. The ballots are now available on the Procedure Committee web site at www.ScarsdaleProcedureCommittee.org , or can be picked up at the Scarsdale Public Library, Scarsdale Village Hall or can be requested from Michelle Lichtenberg, Chair of the Procedure Committee, (914-725-6545).

Absentee ballots must be received by the Scarsdale Post Office by 5PM Monday, November 14th. Print the ballot from the Procedure Committee website, fill it out and mail it to:

The Procedure Committee
P.O.Box 284
Scarsdale, New York 10583

Here's whos running for the Citizen's Nominating Committee:

Edgewood (Vote for 2)

Nathan M. Barotz
Betsy Bush
Michael Duncanson
Ken Kehoe

Fox Meadow (Vote for 2)

Linda Blair
Anita Mann
Salvatore Rao
Theodore Tyberg, MD

Greenacres (Vote for 3)

Glenn I. Fishman, MD
Michael Green
Barbara L. Jaffe
Mona Longman
Andrew Sereysky
JeannetteWarner-Goldstein

Heathcote (Vote for 2)

Norman Bernstein
Ray Cooper
David Michaels
Emilia Rodriguez

Quaker Ridge (Vote for 2)

Douglas R. Birns
Norbert Elsner, MD
Kenneth Keats
Joseph E. Sarachek

In addition, the ballot includes nine proposed amendments to the Non-Partisan Resolution. They can be also be viewed on the Procedure Committee website and a summary of the amendmentsis below for your review. If approved, the proposed amendments would accomplish the objectives of encouraging broader participation in the election of members of the Citizens Nominating Committee, diversifying the membership of the Committee and avoiding the appearance of conflicts of interest on such Committee by:

1. Prohibiting two persons from the same household from simultaneously serving as a voting member of the CNC.

2. Prohibiting a former Mayor or Trustee of the Village from running for election to the CNC unless more than one election cycle (approximately 19 months) has passed since the person last served in such position.

3. Allowing residents to vote by mail-in ballot, accompanied by a certification of eligibility to vote.

4. Prohibiting any member of the Citizens Nominating Committee from simultaneously being a member of The Procedure Committee.

5. Prohibiting any person from serving as a voting member of the CNC for more than three consecutive years, except under circumstances where a person was elected to fill a one-year vacancy in the CNC.

6. Prohibiting any person from serving as a voting member of the CNC who is at the time of the election a member of certain other Village Committees or Boards.

7. Allowing the Procedure Committee to make recommendations on Rules of Procedure consistent with the purpose and provisions of the Non-Partisan Resolution.

8. Providing that any questions of compliance with the provisions of the Resolution shall be ruled on by the Chairperson, whose decision can only be overruled by a 2/3 vote of the voting members present.

9. Providing that no vote for any nominee for a particular office shall be taken at a meeting at which a Committee member has presented new information as to a nominee for such office based upon the Committee member’s personal experience.

Remember to vote on Tuesday November 15 at Scardale Village Hall.

Details: Published: 26 October 2011; Created: 26 October 2011; Last Updated: 27 October 2011; Hits: 7709

brodskya Scarsdale is finally ready to adopt new Village code that would support Westchester County’s mandate to provide 750 fair and affordable housing units, per a 2009 settlement agreement with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. A new law will likely be passed in Scarsdale that will require all future housing developers to provide at least one fair and affordable unit for every ten single units, or for every five to nine multi-family units. The fair and affordable units are to be marketed in accordance with the requirements, policies, and protocols established by the county. Furthermore, the exterior appearance of the affordable units must be compatible with all other units within the development. You can review the entire text of the recommended code here.

Three people approached the microphone to voice their opinions regarding the fair and affordable housing law during a hearing at the Scarsdale Board of Trustees meeting at Village Hall on Tuesday night. The board deferred the vote to allow time to consider the opinions of residents who came out to speak their minds.

Thus, if you’d still like to make a comment, it’s not too late. After delivering a complete review of the proposed amendments, Trustee Stacey Brodsky announced that a continuation of the public hearing is to resume during the subsequent meeting, which will be held on November 9th. Residents will again have the opportunity to speak their minds before the Board votes to adopt the recommended language into law.

Beatrice Underweiser represented the Scarsdale Forum’s Zoning and Planning Committee and voiced her organization’s support before she asked a question that turned the heads of a few board members.

“Who will pay for the monitoring?” Underweiser exclaimed. Under the new act, implementation and compliance will have to be monitored and it will not be done for free. A few of the Board members looked reluctant to take the question, but Brodsky came forth with a reassuring response. She stated that the developers and landlords will eventually foot the bill; but until then, Westchester County will be held responsible. Ultimately, the monitoring costs will not be coming out of Scarsdale’s budget.

Represented by Kit Rosenthal, the Scarsdale League of Women Voters also expressed their support of the proposed act. Their only concern was the marketing requirements for the units, as the League expressed their desire to make housing available to those who live and work in Scarsdale. The board did not have an immediate response for Rosenthal, and they may find this concern to be a larger issue than expected. In the section titled, “Affirmative Marketing,” the act reads as follows:

“The affordable units created under the provisions of this Article shall be sold or rented, and resold and re-rented during the required period of affordability to only qualified income-eligible households. Such income eligible households shall be solicited by the seller or lessor in accordance with the requirements, policies and protocols established by the County of Westchester and in accordance with the monitoring agency so designated pursuant to §310-116 of this chapter, so as to ensure outreach to racially and ethnically diverse households.”

Since the act requires the units to be marketed to racially and ethnically diverse households, a high majority of Scarsdale residents will not qualify for the new housing. This will surely be addressed on November 9th, as well as the Board’s replies to questions posed by local resident, Martin Kaufman, which were submitted in writing for further review.

So, why not come to the next meeting to express your opinions? There were less than ten seats filled by residents last night, so I’ll advertise this meeting right now. Scarsdale, a place that has a lacked low-income housing, is about to take a huge step towards complying with the terms of the settlement. This act has been a vital topic of discussion for all of Westchester County for over two years, and Scarsdale is two weeks away from a decision. Let them know what you think.

Here is the Scarsdale League of Women Voter's Statement that was read at the meeting:

Scarsdale League of Women Voters Statement on the Proposed Amendment of the Zoning Code relating to the provision of Fair and Affordable Housing October 2011

The League of Women Voters has a longstanding position in support of measures to increase the supply of housing in Scarsdale for a wider income range than now exists and therefore supports an affordable housing zoning code amendment. There remain certain provisions of this amendment that necessitate further comment from the LWVS.

Author Michael Kanner is a graduate of Union College with a background in English and a passion for the written word. He worked at Scarsdale Golf Club as a tennis pro before offering his services to a private clientele, and he loves hearing constructive criticism from anyone willing to speak their mind. Michael can be contacted at [email protected]